REVIEW PAPER
Human tuberculosis in colonial Victorian and present-day Britain
Ross Cooper 1  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Division of Physiology, Faculty of Health, Birmingham City University, UK
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Ross Cooper   

Division of Physiology, Faculty of Health, Birmingham City University, 704 Baker Building, Perry Barr, Birmingham B42 2SU, UK.
 
J Pre Clin Clin Res. 2008;2(1):9–12
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Tuberculosis (TB) (consumption) is a particularly unpleasant disease that has seen a re-emergence in Britain, especially among immigrant populations. The objective of the review was to consolidate the principal and important articles written on TB in Britain over the last six decades, including its contraction in humans. The criteria used in the current review for selecting articles were both theoretically and practically motivated and adopted from proposed criteria in The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for the 19th century; 20th century; and 21st century. Data was classified according to a normal distribution, with the 20th century expressing the greater readership. The results show that in the 1890s people became more aware of the threat of TB-infected meat. Tuberculin was the name used to describe the ‘poison’ produced by the bacilli. In February 2005, the British government announced proposals to implement existing health initiatives by screening visa applicants for TB from identified high-risk routes, and enforcing treatment of those positively diagnosed before being allowed entry into and stay in Britain. With increasing entry of foreign-born people into the UK it is essential that effective controls are established to prevent the spread of the disease. There are associations with a weakened immune system and TB, particularly amongst HIV positive individuals.
 
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Welshman J, Bashford A: Tuberculosis, migration, and medical examination: lessons from history. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006, 60, 282-284.
 
2.
Halsey JP, Reeback J S, Barnes CG: A decade of skeletal tuberculosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1982, 41, 7-10.
 
3.
Binney M: The Women Who Lived for Danger: the Women Agents of SOE in the Second World War, London, Hodder and Stoughton, 2002.
 
4.
Mercer AJ: Risk of dying from tuberculosis or cancer: further aspects of a possible association. Int J Epidemiol 1981, 10(4), 377-380.
 
5.
Peppiatt R, Byass P: A survey of the health of British missionaries. Brit J Gen Pract 1991, April, 159-162.
 
6.
Coker R: Civil liberties and public good: detention of tuberculosis patients and the Public Health Act 1984. Med Hist 2001, 45, 341- 358.
 
7.
Grange J M, Gandy M, Farmer P, Zumla A: Historical declines in tuberculosis: nature, nuture and the biosocial model. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001, 5(3), 208-212.
 
8.
Shabbir I, Iqbal R, Khan SU: An analysis of sputum smear and x-ray results in diagnosis of smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Pak J Med Res 2007, 46(3), 67-69.
 
9.
Draper R. BCG vaccination. Available at: http://www.patient.co.uk/ printer.aspdoc=40025005. Accessed 20 February 2008.
 
10.
Keynes R: Annie’s Box: Charles Darwin, his Daughter, and Human Evolution. Fourth Estate Publishers, London 2001, 350.
 
11.
Waddington K. ‘Unfi t for human consumption’: tuberculosis and the mproblem of infected meat in late Victorian Britain. Bull Hist Med 2003, 77(3), 636-661.
 
12.
Myers JA: Development of knowledge of unity of tuberculosis and of the portals of entry of tubercle bacilli. J Hist Med 1974 (April), 213-228.
 
13.
Kellogg JH: The Home Hand-Book of Domestic Hygiene and Rational Medicine. Victoria, Australia: Echo Publishing Company Ltd., 1902: pp. 1675.
 
14.
Moss ML: Stevens’ cure for tuberculosis. J R Soc Med 2002, 95, 575.
 
15.
Haines M: The emergence of pathology in gynaecology. J Clin Pathol 1971, 24, 375-384.
 
16.
Morris BDA: Pugh and his traction. Proc Roy Soc Med 1972, 65, 382.
 
17.
Bryder L: ‘We shall not fi nd salvation in inoculation’: BCG vaccination in Scandinavia, Britain and the USA, 1921-1960. Soc Sci Med 1999, 49, 1157-1167.
 
18.
McDougall JB: Tuberculosis. A Global Study in Social Pathology. Livingstone, Edinburgh 1949, 416.
 
19.
Greenwood M: Professor Calmette’s Statistical Study of BCG. Vaccination. Brit Med J 1928, 3514, 793.
 
20.
Clarke BR: The Causes and Prevention of Tuberculosis. Livingstone, Edinburgh 1952, 288.
 
21.
Wingfi eld RC: Modern Methods in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Constable and Co., London 1924, 120.
 
22.
Anonymous. B.C.G. tested. Brit Med J 1973, 24, 435.
 
23.
Wilson LG: Commentary: Medicine, population, and tuberculosis. Int J Epidemiol 2005, 34, 521-524.
 
24.
Government HM: Controlling our borders: making migration work for Britain: fi ve year strategy for asylum and immigration. Cm 6472. London, UK: TSO, 2005, 26: para. 52.
 
25.
Hardie RM, Watson JM: Screening migrants at risk of tuberculosis. B M J 1993, 307, 1539-1540.
 
26.
McCarthy O: Interval between entry or re-entry to Britain and notifi cation of tuberculosis among Asians in London. Br J Dis Chest 1984, 78, 248-253.
 
27.
Menzies D: Tuberculosis crosses borders. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2000, 4(12), 153-159.
 
28.
Michael Taylor G, Young DB, Mays SA: Genotypic Analysis of the Earliest Known Prehistoric Case of Tuberculosis in Britain. J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43(5), 2236-2240.
 
29.
The Press Association: Legal challenge to Defra TB testing, 1 February 2008, 1.
 
30.
The Department of Health: Stopping tuberculosis in England. Skipton House, London, October 2004, 21.
 
31.
The Department of Health: Tuberculosis prevention and treatment: a toolkit for planning, commissioning and delivering high-quality services in England. Skipton House, London, June 2007, 55.
 
eISSN:1898-7516
ISSN:1898-2395