REVIEW PAPER
Efficacy of interferential current on relieving pain of musculoskeletal origin – protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis undertaken
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
2
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Hail, Ha’il, Saudi Arabia
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Hisham Mohamed Hussein   

Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt., Ahmed Elzayat, Giza, Egypt
 
J Pre Clin Clin Res. 2020;14(3):69–72
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and Objective:
Interferential current IFC is one of the common electrotherapeutic modalities used in the treatment of painful conditions. Patients with musculoskeletal pain seek medical help in order to reduce their pain that could be achieved using IFC.The current review aims to analyze the recently available information regarding the efficacy of the IFC in alleviating the pain of musculoskeletal origin.

State of knowledge:
IFC, as one of the medium frequency currents, has the advantage of being more comfortable and deeply penetrating so that it can reach deeper painful tissues. It has been proposed that IFC can relieve pain through stimulating different body mechanisms, such as the gate mechanism and the release of body opioids. However, the evidence behind the effectiveness of IFC as a pain-relieving modality for musculoskeletal pain has been poorly studied and still not conclusive

Conclusions:
This systematic review will summarize the effects of IFC on relieving musculoskeletal pain as reported through improvement in visual analog scale, numeric pain rating scale, or the McGill pain questionnaire. Through searching multiple databases and including randomized controlled trials published during the last ten years, the findings of the current systematic review and meta-analysis will establish the quality of the recently available evidence and demonstrate if there will be a need for further studies.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare they have no competing interest
FUNDING
Self-funded
Hisham Mohamed Hussein, Raghad Alshammari, Sultana Al-Barak, Norah Alshammari, Shahad Alajlan. Efficacy of interferential current on relieving the pain of musculoskeletal origin: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pre-Clin Clin Res. 2020; 14(3): 69–72.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Fernandes RdCP, da Silva Pataro SM, De Carvalho RB, Burdorf A. The concurrence of musculoskeletal pain and associated work-related factors: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16: 1–9.
 
2.
Shaker A, Ala’a Abdulrhman Almazzah AH, Asiri MSA, AlQahtani MAM, Ali M, Al-Mteer A, et al. Pattern and determinants of musculo-skeletal pain among surgeons in Abha and Khamis Mushet City, Saudi Arabia. IJMDC. 2020; 4: 652–9.
 
3.
Blyth FM, Noguchi N. Chronic musculoskeletal pain and its impact on older people. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2017; 31: 160–8.
 
4.
Cimas M, Ayala A, Sanz B, Agulló-Tomás M, Escobar A, Forjaz M. Chronic musculoskeletal pain in European older adults: Cross national and gender differences. Eur J Pain. 2018; 22: 333–45.
 
5.
Azabagic S, Spahic R, Pranjic N, Mulic M. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders in primary school children in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Mater Sociomed. 2016; 28: 164–7.
 
6.
World Health Organization. Musculoskeletal conditions report. Geneva: WHO. 2019.
 
7.
Cimmino MA, Ferrone C, Cutolo M. Epidemiology of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011; 25: 173–83.
 
8.
Knittle K, De Gucht V, Maes S. Lifestyle-and behaviour-change interventions in musculoskeletal conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012; 26: 293–304.
 
9.
Carvalho E, Bettger JP, Goode AP. Insurance coverage, costs, and barriers to care for outpatient musculoskeletal therapy and rehabilitation services. N C Med J. 2017; 78: 312–4.
 
10.
Calner T, Isaksson G, Michaelson P. Physiotherapy treatment experiences of persons with persistent musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019: 1–10.
 
11.
Petrofsky J, Laymon M, Lee H. Local heating of trigger points reduces neck and plantar fascia pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020; 33: 21–8.
 
12.
Amjad F, Shahid HA, Batool S, Ahmad A, Ahmed I. A Comparison on Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Therapeutic Ultrasound in Treatment of Myofascial Trigger Points. KMUJ. 2016; 8: 3–6.
 
13.
Sayilir S. The short-term effects of TENS plus therapeutic ultrasound combinations in chronic neck pain. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018; 31: 278–81.
 
14.
Nazligul T, Akpinar P, Aktas I, Ozkan FU, Hartevioglu HC. The effect of interferential current therapy on patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018; 54: 351–7.
 
15.
Serafim A, Rabel J, Neves M, Da Silva TS, Bertolini GRF. Evaluation of acute low back pain in women after treatment with interferential current. JPCCR. 2019; 13: 57–60.
 
16.
Brown AM, Zifchock RA, Hillstrom HJ. The effects of limb dominance and fatigue on running biomechanics. Gait Posture. 2014; 39: 915–9.
 
17.
Palmer S, Martin D. Interferential current for pain control. UWE Bristol. 2002; 11: 287–300.
 
18.
Chipchase LS, Williams MT, Robertson VJ. A national study of the availability and use of electrophysical agents by Australian physiotherapists. Physiother Theory Pract. 2009; 25: 279–96.
 
19.
Ghulam Sarwar Shah S, Farrow A, Esnouf A. Availability and use of electrotherapy devices: a survey. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2007; 14: 260–4.
 
20.
Tabasam G, Johnson MI. The use of interferential therapy for pain management by physiotherapists. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2006; 13: 357–64.
 
21.
Haq K. Preference of modalities and exercises by physiotherapists. Rawal Medical Journal. 2019; 44.
 
22.
De Domenico G. Pain relief with interferential therapy. Aust J Physiother. 1982; 28: 14–8.
 
23.
Goats G. Interferential current therapy. Br J Sports Med. 1990; 24: 87–92.
 
24.
Johnson MI, Tabasam G. A single-blind investigation into the hypoalgesic effects of different swing patterns of interferential currents on cold-induced pain in healthy volunteers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 350–7.
 
25.
Fuentes JP, Armijo Olivo S, Magee DJ, Gross DP. Effectiveness of interferential current therapy in the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2010; 90: 1219–38.
 
26.
Beatti A, Rayner A, Souvlis T, Chipchase L. The analgesic effect of interferential therapy on clinical and experimentally induced pain. Phys Ther Rev. 2010; 15: 243–52.
 
27.
Almeida CC, Azevedo KP, Cacho TA, Leal JBG, Montanini GN, Silva DNT, et al. Effects of electroanalgesia on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Trials Degener Dis. 2019; 4: 70–5.
 
28.
de Almeida CC, da Silva VZM, Júnior GC, Liebano RE, Durigan JLQ. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current demonstrate similar effects in relieving acute and chronic pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2018; 22: 347–54.
 
29.
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan — a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016; 5.
 
30.
Olivo SA, Macedo LG, Gadotti IC, Fuentes J, Stanton T, Magee DJ. Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008; 88: 156–75.
 
eISSN:1898-7516
ISSN:1898-2395