REVIEW PAPER
Endodontic treatment of immature tooth – a challenge
 
More details
Hide details
1
Dasmesh Institute of Research & Dental Sciences, Faridkot, India
2
Guru Gobind Singh Medical Hospital, Faridkot, India
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Ravinder Nath Bansal   

Guru Gobind Singh Medical Hospital, Medical Campus, 151203, Faridkot, India
 
J Pre Clin Clin Res. 2020;14(3):73–79
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Root apex is an area of primary importance for an endodontist. When a tooth erupts in the oral cavity the apical foramen undergoes anatomical changes with age. Root development is completed and the root apex is closed three years after eruption of the tooth. Endodontic practice is influenced to a great extent by different stages of root development and the type of tissue present within the roots. Open apices pose a challenging problem for the success of root canal treatment because they favour the extravasation of the irrigating solution and/or sealer into periradicular tissues, thus jeopardizing apical healing. Regenerative endodontics (revascularization/pulpal regeneration) is a straightforward approach accomplished with currently available instruments and materials. A literature review suggests that Mineral Tri oxide Aggregate (MTA) is the most favourable and recommendable material for single-visit apexification, even in cases when regenerative endodontics cannot be performed. A plus point of MTA is its biocompatibility and hermetic apical seal with no micro-leakage. It should be considered as an effective alternate for treating immature teeth with necrotic pulps. Treatment of a tooth with open apex poses multiple challenges. However, it is not easy to decide which material should be used: Calcium hydroxide, Mineral Tri oxide Aggregate, Biodentine, Platlet Rich Fibrin (PRF), or White Portland Cement (WPC). The choice of treatment regimen depends on several factors, e.g. individual cases, experience of the operator, familiarity with handling various materials, and patient’s availability for follow-up appointments. This review highlights various challenges in the treatment of open apex, with emphasis on MTA compared with other materials
 
REFERENCES (61)
1.
Smyth R, Bob Philpot B. Management of the open apex in endodontics: Scottish Dental magazine. Available from: https://www.sdmag.co.uk/2017/0....
 
2.
Das T, Gupta S, Atom J, Lairenlakpam R, Gupta S, Chaudhary A. Endodontic management of blunderbuss canal with open apex and Ellis Class IV fracture using mineral trioxide aggregate and compo-post. Int J Prev Clin Dent Res. 2019; 6: 66–8. Available from: http://www.ijpcdr.org/text.asp....
 
3.
Jain P, Rita C, Agarwal RS. Single Visit Apexification Technique for Inducing Root-End Barrier Formation in Apical Closures: Report of Two Cases. P J Sci Res. 2014; 7(1): 40–46.
 
4.
Khetarpal A, Chaudhary S, Talwar S, Verma M. Endodontic management of open apex using Biodentine as a novel apical matrix. Ind J Dent Res. 2014; 25: 513–16. Available from: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?20....
 
5.
Dali M, Rajbanshi L. Regenerative endodontics: Changes, chances, and challenges of revascularization in pediatric dentistry. SRM J Res Dent Sci. 2014; 5: 186–189. Available from: http://www.srmjrds.in/text.asp....
 
6.
Fahd A A Karim, Kazi Hossain Mahmud, Asma Sultana, Shirin Sultana Chawdhari, Muktadir Hossain Shaihan Mohamed, Parmina D. Costa.Management of non-vital anterior tooth with open apex by MTA apical plug – A case report. Up Den Col J. 2019; 9(1): 42–45. doi:ht t ps://doi.org/10.3329/updcj.v9i1.412....
 
7.
Mathew J, Syriac G, Nair M, Rahul J. Conventional Multi visit Calcium Hydroxide Apexification with Rare Apexogenesis Like Outcome and Novel Single Visit MTA Apexification Followed by Root Reinforcement with Fiber Post: Two Case Reports. Saudi J Oral Dent Res. 2017; 2(2): 43–48. doi: 10.21276/sjodr.2017.2.2.1.
 
8.
Saha S, Agrawal V, Srikumar GPV, Sharma V. Single Visit MTA Appexification of a Blunderbuss Canal: A Case Report. Int J Oral Health Med Res. 2016; 3(3): 77–79. ISSN 2395-7387.
 
9.
Economides N, Pantelidou O, Kokkas A, Tziafas D. Short-term periradicuiar tissue response to MTA as a root end filling material. Int Endo J. 2003; 36: 44–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0143.... 2003.00611.x.
 
10.
Lee SJ, Monsef M, Torabinejad M. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod. 1993; 19: 541–4.
 
11.
Schwartz RS, Mauger M, Clement DJ, Walker WA. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A new material for endodontics. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999; 130: 967–75.
 
12.
Srinivasan V, Waterhouse P, Whitworth J. Mineral trioxide aggregate in paediatric dentistry. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2009; 19: 34–47.
 
13.
Asgary S, Parirokh M, Egbbal MJ, Brink F. Chemical differences between white and gray mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2005; 31: 101–3.
 
14.
Macwan C, Deshpande A. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in dentistry: A review of literature. J Oral Res Rev. 2014; 6: 71–4.
 
15.
Sluyk SR, Moon PC, Hartwell GR. Evaluation of setting properties and retention characteristics of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate when used as a furcation perforation repair material. J Endod. 1998; 24: 768–71.
 
16.
Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1999; 25: 197–205.
 
17.
Schmitt D, Lee J, Bogen G. Multifaceted use of ProRoot MTA root canal repair material. Pediatr Dent. 2001; 23: 326–30.
 
18.
Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Brady K, Sweeney R, Curtis RV, Ford TR. The constitution of mineral trioxide aggregate. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(4): 297–303.
 
19.
Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Di Silvio L, Pitt Ford TR. The chemical constitution and biocompatibility of accelerated Portland cement for endodontic use. Int Endod J. 2005; 38(11): 834–42.
 
20.
Camilleri J. Characterization of hydration products of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J. 2008; 41(5): 408–17.
 
21.
Holland R, Filho JA, de Souza V, Nery MJ, Bernabe PF, Junior ED. Mineral trioxide aggregate repair of lateralroot perforations. J Endod. 2001; 27: 281–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/000047....
 
22.
Withersppon DE, Small JC, Regan JD, et al. Retrospective analysis of open apex teeth obturated with mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2008; 34, 1171–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen... pmid:18793914.
 
23.
Aminoshariac A, Hart Well GR. Moon PC. Placement of MTA Using 2 different techniques. J Endo. 2003; 29, 679–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/000047....
 
24.
Kokate SR, Pawar AM. An in vitro comparative stereomicroscopic evaluation of marginal seal between MTA, Glass Inomer Cement and Biodentine as root end filling materials using 1% methylene blue as tracer. Endod. 2012; 2: 36–42.
 
25.
About I, Laurent P, Tecles O. Bioactivity of Biodentine™ a CA3SiO5-based Dentine Substitute. Oral session. IADR Congress 2010 July, Barcelona, Spain.
 
26.
Laurent P, Camps J, About I. Biodentine (TM) induces TGF-ß1 release from human pulp cells and early dental pulp mineralization. Int End J. 2012; 45: 439–48.
 
27.
Wucherpfenning AC, Green DB. Mineral trioxide VS Portland cement: two biocompatible filling material. J End. 1999; 25: 308.
 
28.
Camilleri J. Hydration mechanisms of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int End J. 2007; 40: 462–70.
 
29.
Tay FR, Pashley DH, Rueggeberg FA, Loushine RJ, Weller RN. Calcium phosphate phase transformation produced by the interaction of the Portland cement component of white mineral trioxide aggregate with a phosphate-containing fluid. J End. 2007; 33: 1347–51.
 
30.
Duarte MA, De Oliveira Demarchi AC, Yamashita JC, Kuga MC, De Campos Fraga S. Arsenic release provided by MTA and Portland cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Rad Endod. 2005; 99: 648–50.
 
31.
Monteiro Bramante C, Demarchi AC, de Moraes IG, Bernadineli N, Garcia RB, Spångberg LS, et al. Presence of arsenic in different types of MTA and white and gray Portland cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Rad Endod. 2008; 106: 909–13.
 
32.
De Deus G, Petruccelli V, Gurgel-Filho E, coutinho-Filho T. MTA versus portland cement as repair material for furcal perforation: a laboratory study using a polymicrobial leakage model. Int End J. 2006; 39: 293–8.
 
33.
Holland R, de Souza V, Murata SS, Nery MJ, Bernabé PF, Otoboni Filho JA, et al. Healing prozess of dog dental pulp after pulpotomy and pulp covering with MTA or Portland cement. Braz Dent J. 2001; 12: 109–13.
 
34.
Menezes R, Bramante CM, Letra A, Carvalho VG, Garcia RB. Histologic evaluation of pulpotomies in dog using two types of MTA and regular and white Portland cements as wound dressings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Rad Endod. 2004; 98: 376–9.
 
35.
Shayegan A, Petein M, Abbeele AV. Beta-tricalzium phosphate, white MTA, white Portland cement, ferric sulfate and formocresol used as pulpotomy agents in primary pig teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Rad Endod. 2008; 105: 536–42.
 
36.
Shayegan A, Petein M, Abbeele AV. The use of beta-tricalcium phosphate, white MTA, white Portland cement and calcium hydroxide for direct pulp capping of primary pig teeth. Dent Traum. 2009; 25: 413–9.
 
37.
Bhadoria N. Case Report on Apexification with Portland Cement in Children. Int J Oral Health Med Res. 2016; 3(3): 67–69. ISSN 2395-7387.
 
38.
Chakraborty A, Dey B, Dhar R, Sardar P. Healing of apical rarefaction of three nonvital open apex anterior teeth using a white portland cement apical plug. Contemp Clin Dent 2012; 3(2): 177–81. Available from: http://w w w.contempclindent.org/text.asp....
 
39.
American Association of Endodontists Glossary of Endodontic Terms. 8th ed. Chicago: 2012.
 
40.
Gupta S, Bansal RN, Sodhi SPS, Brar GK, Bansal R. Patent: A Journey From Idea To Patent. Inn Int J Sci. 2018; 5(6): 5–11. ISSN 2349–7041.
 
41.
Gupta S, Bansal RN, Bansal R, Sodhi SP, Brar GK. Physician’s Participation in Clinical Research – a questionnaire study. J Pre Clin Clin Res. 2019; 13 (2): 57–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.26444/jpccr....
 
42.
Root canal for tissue in-growth. https://patents.google.com/pat.... (access: 2020.05.14).
 
43.
Sealbio: a novel non-obturation regenerative technique of endodontic treatment. https://patents.google.com/pat... (access 14–5–2020).
 
44.
AAE Clinical Considerations for a Regenerative Procedure Revised4/1/2018: https://f3f142zs0k2w1kg84k5p9i....
 
45.
Murray PE, Garcia-Godoy F, Hargreaves KM. Regenerative endodontics: A review of current status and a call for action. J Endod. 2007; 33: 377–90.
 
46.
Banchs F, Trope M. Revascularization of immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis: New treatment protocol? J Endod. 2004; 30: 196–200.
 
47.
Garcia-Godoy F, Murray PE. Recommendations for using regenerative endodontic procedures in permanent immature traumatized teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2012; 28: 33–41.
 
48.
Sakthi S, Bharadwaj SL. Pulp revascularisation in pediatric dentistry. J Int Dent. 2012; 1: 34–6.
 
49.
Surender LR, Habeeb, A. A novel combination of injectable plasma rich fibrin and biodentine for the endodontic management of a tooth with an open apex and periapical lesion – a case report. Int J Sci Res. 2017; 6(6): 43–44.
 
50.
Miron R, Choukroun J, Ghanaati S. Controversies related to scientific report describing g-forces from studies on platelet-rich fibrin: Necessity for standardization of relative centrifugal force values. Int J Growth Factors Stem Cells Dent. 2018; 1: 80–9. doi: 10.4103/GFSC.GFSC_23_18.
 
51.
Güven Polat G, Yıldırım C, Akgün OM, Altun C, Dinçer D, Ozkan CK. The use of platelet rich plasma in the treatment of immature tooth with periapical lesion: a case report. Restor Dent Endod. 2014; 39(3): 230–234. doi:10.5395/rde.2014.39.3.230.
 
52.
Gupta S. True pain of false healing -various treatment modalities (a research perspective). J Ayur Hol Med. 2018; 6(I): 38–50. ISSN-2321-1563.
 
53.
Lin JC, Lu JX, Zeng Q, Zhao W, Li WQ, Ling JQ. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium hydroxide for apexification of immature permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Formosan Med Ass. 2016; 115(7): 523–530. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2016.01.010.
 
54.
Utneja S, Nawal RR, Talwar S, Verma M. Current perspectives of bio-ceramic technology in endodontics: calcium enriched mixture cement – review of its composition, properties and applications. Rest Dent End. 2015: 40; 1–13.
 
55.
Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review–Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod. 2010; 36: 400–413.
 
56.
Hargreaves KM, Diogenes A, Teixeira FB. Treatment options: biological basis of regenerative endodontic procedures. Pediatr Dent. 2013; 35: 129–140.
 
57.
Shabahang S. Treatment options: apexogenesis and apexification. J Endod. 2103; 39: 26–29.
 
58.
Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, Kohli S. Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and MTA Plus in furcation perforation repair. J Conserv Dent. 2013; 16: 462–5.
 
59.
Saidon J, He J, Zhu Q, Safavi K, Spångberg LS. Cell and tissue reactions to mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 95: 483–9.
 
60.
Graziele Magro M, Carlos Kuga M, Adad Ricci W, Cristina Keine K, Rodrigues Tonetto M, Linares Lima S, et al. Endodontic Management of Open Apex Teeth Using Lyophilized Collagen Sponge and MTA Cement: Report of Two Cases. Iran Endod J. 2017; 12(2): 248–252. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.48.
 
61.
Khetarpal A, Chaudhry S, Talwar S, Verma M. Endodontic management of open apex using MTA and platelet – rich fibrin membrane barrier: A newer matrix concept. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013; 5(5) :e291–e294. doi: 10.4317/jced.51178.
 
eISSN:1898-7516
ISSN:1898-2395