REVIEW PAPER
Lean thinking strategy in surgical assessment units in English hospitals
 
More details
Hide details
1
Division of Physiology, Faculty of Health, Birmingham City University, 704 Baker Building, Franchise Street, Perry Barr, Birmingham B42 2SU, UK
2
Division of Health Policy & Public Health, Department of Community Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, 713 Baker Building, Birmingham B42 2SU, UK
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Ross Cooper   

Division of Physiology, Faculty of Health, Birmingham City University, 704 Baker Building, Franchise Street, Perry Barr, Birmingham B42 2SU, UK.
 
J Pre Clin Clin Res. 2008;2(2):106–109
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Hospital wards in the National Health Service (NHS) are sometimes beset with numerous problems including long waiting times and perceived unhelpfulness of staff. Cash wastage occurs in departments that are overstaffed and swamped with paperwork. Lean thinking may be the way forward for improving working efficiency and driving change towards the enhancement of services. We propose unique models of whole-system thinking of the principal operations in surgical assessment practice, and the desired innovative care parameters with examples of nephrourologic units. We suggest a strategic innovative approach using an eight-R approach: responsiveness, reliability, resources, respect, relationships, responsibilities, roles and reassurance. Our proposed model aims to manage the realisation of lean benefits of renal care in a disciplined and systematic manner, which is just as important for any other aspect of a hospital care business.
 
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Andrews E: This ‘catastrophic NHS meltdown’. Daily Mail, August 2008, 25, 10.
 
2.
The Press Association 2008: Superbug deaths rise by 28%. Available at: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/press... by28- 6323e80.html (accessed on 28 August 2008).
 
3.
Tsasis P, Bruce-Barrett C: Organizational change through Lean Thinking. Health Serv Manage Res 2008, 21, 192-198.
 
4.
Cooper RG, Mohabeersingh C: Lean thinking for medical practices. JPCCR 2008, 2(1), 88-89.
 
5.
MacDonald A, Dinah F, MacKenzie D, Wilson A: Performance feedback of hand hygiene, using alcohol gel as the skin decontaminant, reduces the number of inpatients newly aff ected by MRSA and antibiotic costs. J Hosp Infect 2004, 56(1), 56-63.
 
6.
Dasgupta I: Renal Medicine 2006. In: S. Bain and JK, Gupta (eds.): Medicine and Surgery. Hodder Arnold, Kent: 91-110.
 
7.
Fargher, EA., Eddy C, Newman W, Qasim F, Tricker, K, Elliott RA, Payne K: Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on pharmacogenetics testing and its future delivery in the NHS. Pharmacogenomics 2007, 8(11), 1511-1519.
 
8.
Hunter DJ: Public Health Policy. Policy Press, Cambridge 2004, pp. 207.
 
9.
Baboolal K, McEwan P, Sondhi S, Spiewanowski P, Wechowski J, Wilson K: The cost of renal dialysis in a UK setting - a multicentre study. Nephrol Dial Transpl 2008, 23(6), 1982-1989.
 
10.
Klebe B, Farmer C, Cooley R, de Lusignan S, Middleton R, O’Donoghue D, New J, Stevens P: Kidney disease management in UK primary care: guidelines, incentives and information technology. Family Practice 2007, 24(4), 330-335.
 
11.
Rudge C, Johnson RJ, Fuggle SV, Forsythe JL: Renal transplantation in the United Kingdom for patients from ethnic minorities. Transplantation 2007, 83(9), 1169-1173.
 
12.
King J: [The personnel policy being tested: the training makes the diff erence]. [Article in German]. Journal of Renal Care 2006, 32(3), 177-180.
 
13.
Brand SL: (2006) Nurses’ roles in discharge decision making in an adult high? Youngman S. (2004) The developing role of the renal diabetes nurse. EDTNA/ERCA Journal 30(3): 169-172 dependency unit. 15: Intensive Critical Care Nursing 22(2): 106-114.
 
14.
Youngman S: The developing role of the renal diabetes nurse. EDTNA/ ERCA Journal 2004, 30(3), 169-172.
 
eISSN:1898-7516
ISSN:1898-2395